The truth about the Bechdel Test, and A-label | Aktivarum
Bechdel Test is a concept that we will hear more and more of now that cinemas will begin feminist label or "A Letter" movies that can do that so-called "test". It's just that the Bechdel test is not testing what it claims it tests - and never made it either.
Here is the background: 1985 Alison Bech Partly kung fu panda movie cartoon collection "Dykes to watch out for" included "THE RULE with thanks to Liz Wallace" where an obvious butch lesbian cartoon female character says she just looks at films that meet the following three requirements.
The past three years have been a massive buddy and peer pressure created where the test allegedly shows how popular culture is women-friendly when in fact "rule" about gay women need to see a certain kind of women on film. The edited kung fu panda movie version of the test is:
What is nowhere kung fu panda movie to be answered is why? It is evident from the series why the two women did not want women would talk about men. 1985 is in breach between gender separatism (queer separatism) and man-hating (radical feminism). The Rule was clearly queer feminist.
However, there is a clue in a cryptic fuzzy and completely fictional kung fu panda movie phrase which attempts kung fu panda movie to assert it's good for democracy. Since there are already at Dig 13 showed that a large part of the PK-media has a negative opinion about the democratic principles it is all the more precarious.
From a democratic perspective, it does matter that today is such a huge imbalance over whose stories and perspectives that we are constantly (and perhaps unconsciously) takes part of, for example, on the big screen.
And the key word is "stories". This is strongly linked with my last post about "Purres Patriarchy, Jennifer Wegerups oppressed position and Other Tales." There, I pointed out how what many today call "interpretation" in fact turns out to be little else than pure fabrications.
Let's say, for example, thinks there are too few female characters in popular culture. It is perfectly logical to assess that case when there are two or more women in a movie. However, there is absolutely no logic in that start putting up demands for minority behaviors of women. kung fu panda movie
Saying kung fu panda movie also that think we need more women's stories in film. When the missing logic in saying a woman's stories are not counted unless it is specific to another woman. That women who want to talk to men or if men thus would show a "Non-Approved" behavior.
And run today's feminist gender equality is always fixed on the same point., They can not decide if they want to have more women or more demands on how women should be (the latter always decreases the number of women that you can have in a story.
It's exactly the same with all other protected minority groups. Let's say we want to criticize the series Seinfeld because it has too few women and blacks. Now tell me which of the other characters in Seinfeld that would trigger protests if the character was black or a woman?
My blog post "Offerperspektivets power Part 1" brings up this with the oppressor (in this case: The woman) because of its moral high positiion becomes a much less interesting character than the target audience (in this case: the man). The relevant text is about "Assigned Value"
When the oppressor either get the help of the hero or injured by the villain becomes the oppressor a very flat and uninteresting character in the fictional world. kung fu panda movie Since the target actions have real consequences as determined by the relationship to the oppressor becomes the target is often a much more interesting character
In short, the logical consequence of the rules about how women should be "real" kung fu panda movie on film means they will not be as versatila as men - which can be produced kung fu panda movie anyway without anyone complaining - because there exists no MIFT compound that puts restrictions.
This has also long been known in the American media. Lobbying screaming and yelling about the groups they must protect is being inaccurately / negative. However, if the protected groups is not at all with such problem does not occur in the same way.
Testing themselves to go through roles with negative behaviors performed by white men, and think about what would have happened if these roles played by blacks or women or anyone else distinctly protected group. The same problem throughout.
That their group is the more often - or that their group is not made more positive. So just like the Bechdel test is done both and will often then not get anywhere because the latter has a negative kung fu panda movie impact on the former.
As you write, it's not just about the inclusion of minority groups, but also to dictate how they are produced and perceived / interpreted. It becomes manusförfattan
Bechdel Test is a concept that we will hear more and more of now that cinemas will begin feminist label or "A Letter" movies that can do that so-called "test". It's just that the Bechdel test is not testing what it claims it tests - and never made it either.
Here is the background: 1985 Alison Bech Partly kung fu panda movie cartoon collection "Dykes to watch out for" included "THE RULE with thanks to Liz Wallace" where an obvious butch lesbian cartoon female character says she just looks at films that meet the following three requirements.
The past three years have been a massive buddy and peer pressure created where the test allegedly shows how popular culture is women-friendly when in fact "rule" about gay women need to see a certain kind of women on film. The edited kung fu panda movie version of the test is:
What is nowhere kung fu panda movie to be answered is why? It is evident from the series why the two women did not want women would talk about men. 1985 is in breach between gender separatism (queer separatism) and man-hating (radical feminism). The Rule was clearly queer feminist.
However, there is a clue in a cryptic fuzzy and completely fictional kung fu panda movie phrase which attempts kung fu panda movie to assert it's good for democracy. Since there are already at Dig 13 showed that a large part of the PK-media has a negative opinion about the democratic principles it is all the more precarious.
From a democratic perspective, it does matter that today is such a huge imbalance over whose stories and perspectives that we are constantly (and perhaps unconsciously) takes part of, for example, on the big screen.
And the key word is "stories". This is strongly linked with my last post about "Purres Patriarchy, Jennifer Wegerups oppressed position and Other Tales." There, I pointed out how what many today call "interpretation" in fact turns out to be little else than pure fabrications.
Let's say, for example, thinks there are too few female characters in popular culture. It is perfectly logical to assess that case when there are two or more women in a movie. However, there is absolutely no logic in that start putting up demands for minority behaviors of women. kung fu panda movie
Saying kung fu panda movie also that think we need more women's stories in film. When the missing logic in saying a woman's stories are not counted unless it is specific to another woman. That women who want to talk to men or if men thus would show a "Non-Approved" behavior.
And run today's feminist gender equality is always fixed on the same point., They can not decide if they want to have more women or more demands on how women should be (the latter always decreases the number of women that you can have in a story.
It's exactly the same with all other protected minority groups. Let's say we want to criticize the series Seinfeld because it has too few women and blacks. Now tell me which of the other characters in Seinfeld that would trigger protests if the character was black or a woman?
My blog post "Offerperspektivets power Part 1" brings up this with the oppressor (in this case: The woman) because of its moral high positiion becomes a much less interesting character than the target audience (in this case: the man). The relevant text is about "Assigned Value"
When the oppressor either get the help of the hero or injured by the villain becomes the oppressor a very flat and uninteresting character in the fictional world. kung fu panda movie Since the target actions have real consequences as determined by the relationship to the oppressor becomes the target is often a much more interesting character
In short, the logical consequence of the rules about how women should be "real" kung fu panda movie on film means they will not be as versatila as men - which can be produced kung fu panda movie anyway without anyone complaining - because there exists no MIFT compound that puts restrictions.
This has also long been known in the American media. Lobbying screaming and yelling about the groups they must protect is being inaccurately / negative. However, if the protected groups is not at all with such problem does not occur in the same way.
Testing themselves to go through roles with negative behaviors performed by white men, and think about what would have happened if these roles played by blacks or women or anyone else distinctly protected group. The same problem throughout.
That their group is the more often - or that their group is not made more positive. So just like the Bechdel test is done both and will often then not get anywhere because the latter has a negative kung fu panda movie impact on the former.
As you write, it's not just about the inclusion of minority groups, but also to dictate how they are produced and perceived / interpreted. It becomes manusförfattan
No comments:
Post a Comment